×
验证码:
换一张
忘记密码?
记住我
×
登录
中文版
|
English
中国科学院青海盐湖研究所机构知识库
Knowledge Management System Of Qinghai Institute of Salt Lakes,CAS
登录
注册
ALL
ORCID
题名
作者
学科领域
关键词
资助项目
文献类型
出处
收录类别
出版者
发表日期
存缴日期
学科门类
学习讨论厅
粘贴图片网址
首页
研究单元&专题
作者
文献类型
学科分类
知识图谱
新闻&公告
在结果中检索
研究单元&专题
无
作者
无
文献类型
无
发表日期
无
语种
无
出处
无
资助项目
无
收录类别
无
资助机构
无
×
知识图谱
ISL OpenIR
开始提交
已提交作品
待认领作品
已认领作品
未提交全文
收藏管理
QQ客服
官方微博
反馈留言
没有检索到与您的查询相符的结果。
限定条件
语种:Flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS) was applied to the determination of rubidium and cesium in chloride type oilfield water by considering the interferences of the coexistent K(+), Na(+), Ca(2+), and Mg(2+) ions. Standard curve method and standard addition method were compared in the determination of rubidium and cesium in the simulated oilfield water and the real oilfield water from the Nanyishan region in Qaidam Basin. Although rubidium and cesium have similar physical-chemical properties, they present different characters during their analyses using the FAAS technique. When the standard addition method was used for the determination of rubidium, and cesium in the simulated oilfield water, the results of rubidium were very poor, whereas the results of cesium were satisfactory. When the standard curve method was used for the determination of rubidium and cesium in the simulated oilfield water, the results of both rubidium and cesium were satisfactory within the linear ranges of the standard curves. For the real oilfield water, standard addition method is also only applicable for the determination of cesium with a recovery ranging from 90% to 110%. While standard curve method is applicable for the determination of both rubidium. and cesium with a recovery ranging from 90% to 110%. Flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS) was applied to the determination of rubidium and cesium in chloride type oilfield water by considering the interferences of the coexistent K(+), Na(+), Ca(2+), and Mg(2+) ions. Standard curve method and standard addition method were compared in the determination of rubidium and cesium in the simulated oilfield water and the real oilfield water from the Nanyishan region in Qaidam Basin. Although rubidium and cesium have similar physical-chemical properties, they present different characters during their analyses using the FAAS technique. When the standard addition method was used for the determination of rubidium, and cesium in the simulated oilfield water, the results of rubidium were very poor, whereas the results of cesium were satisfactory. When the standard curve method was used for the determination of rubidium and cesium in the simulated oilfield water, the results of both rubidium and cesium were satisfactory within the linear ranges of the standard curves. For the real oilfield water, standard addition method is also only applicable for the determination of cesium with a recovery ranging from 90% to 110%. While standard curve method is applicable for the determination of both rubidium. and cesium with a recovery ranging from 90% to 110%