Determination of Rubidium and Cesium in Chloride Type Oilfield Water byFlame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry

ISL OpenIR > 青海盐湖研究所知识仓储

	Determination of Rubidium and Cesium in Chloride Type Oilfield Water byFlame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry
	Ye Xiu-shen; Zhang Shan-ying; Li Hai-jun; Li Wu; Wu Zhi-jian
	2009
发表期刊	SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS
ISSN	1000-0593
卷号	29 期号:3 页码:833-836
关键词	Rubidium Cesium Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry Oilfield Water
语种	Flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS) was applied to the determination of rubidium and cesium in chloride type oilfield water by considering the interferences of the coexistent K(+), Na(+), Ca(2+), and Mg(2+) ions. Standard curve method and standard addition method were compared in the determination of rubidium and cesium in the simulated oilfield water and the real oilfield water from the Nanyishan region in Qaidam Basin. Although rubidium and cesium have similar physical-chemical properties, they present different characters during their analyses using the FAAS technique. When the standard addition method was used for the determination of rubidium, and cesium in the simulated oilfield water, the results of rubidium were very poor, whereas the results of cesium were satisfactory. When the standard curve method was used for the determination of rubidium and cesium in the simulated oilfield water, the results of both rubidium and cesium were satisfactory within the linear ranges of the standard curves. For the real oilfield water, standard addition method is also only applicable for the determination of cesium with a recovery ranging from 90% to 110%. While standard curve method is applicable for the determination of both rubidium. and cesium with a recovery ranging from 90% to 110%. Flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS) was applied to the determination of rubidium and cesium in chloride type oilfield water by considering the interferences of the coexistent K(+), Na(+), Ca(2+), and Mg(2+) ions. Standard curve method and standard addition method were compared in the determination of rubidium and cesium in the simulated oilfield water and the real oilfield water from the Nanyishan region in Qaidam Basin. Although rubidium and cesium have similar physical-chemical properties, they present different characters during their analyses using the FAAS technique. When the standard addition method was used for the determination of rubidium, and cesium in the simulated oilfield water, the results of rubidium were very poor, whereas the results of cesium were satisfactory. When the standard curve method was used for the determination of rubidium and cesium in the simulated oilfield water, the results of both rubidium and cesium were satisfactory within the linear ranges of the standard curves. For the real oilfield water, standard addition method is also only applicable for the determination of cesium with a recovery ranging from 90% to 110%. While standard curve method is applicable for the determination of both rubidium. and cesium with a recovery ranging from 90% to 110%.
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://ir.isl.ac.cn/handle/363002/2114
专题	青海盐湖研究所知识仓储
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Ye Xiu-shen,Zhang Shan-ying,Li Hai-jun,et al. Determination of Rubidium and Cesium in Chloride Type Oilfield Water byFlame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS,2009,29(3):833-836.
APA	Ye Xiu-shen,Zhang Shan-ying,Li Hai-jun,Li Wu,&Wu Zhi-jian.(2009).Determination of Rubidium and Cesium in Chloride Type Oilfield Water byFlame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry.SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS,29(3),833-836.
MLA	Ye Xiu-shen,et al."Determination of Rubidium and Cesium in Chloride Type Oilfield Water byFlame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry".SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS 29.3(2009):833-836.