ISL OpenIR  > 青海盐湖研究所知识仓储
Determination of Lithium in the Oil Field Water by Flame AtomicAbsorption Spectrometry
Yang Hong-jun; Ye Xiu-shen; Li Bing; Wu Zhi-jian; Li Wu
2009
发表期刊SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS
ISSN1000-0593
卷号29期号:1页码:263-267
产权排序SCI
关键词Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry Oil Field Water Lithium
语种Flame atomic absorption spectrometry was applied to the determination of micro amount of lithium in the oil field water of certain area. In order to determine which method is more appropriate for the determination of lithium content in the oil field water, standard curve method and standard addition method were compared. The effects of dilution, coexistent ions, and deionizers on the determination were studied. For the determination of lithium content in the same diluted oil field water samples, there exist obvious differences between the results obtained from standard addition method and standard curve method. Standard addition method gives results with a larger error, whereas standard curve method gives more accurate results. It is difficult to eliminate the interferences when the standard addition method is used. The standard curve method is found to be more suitable for the determination of micro amount of lithium in the oil field water for its accuracy, simplicity, and feasibility. When the standard curve method is used, both the determined lithium concentration and the recovery change with the dilution extent of the oil field water. In order to get an accurate result, the oil field water sample should be diluted to 1/200 or less. In this case, the recovery by standard addition method ranges from 94.3% to 96.9%. When sodium phosphate or sodium chloride is used as the deionizer, the recovery by standard addition method ranges from 94.6% to 98.6%, or from 94.2% to 96.3%. In the determination of lithium content in oil field water, there are larger experimental errors without the addition of any deionizer. When the concentration of coexistent ions is within an allowed range, the addition of sodium phosphate as a deionizer can eliminate the interferences of the coexistent ions with the determination of the lithium content. If sodium chloride is used as a deionizer, a more accurate result can be obtained when the sodium content in the samples is near the sodium content in the standard solutions. In general, tinder suitable experimental conditions, sodium chloride can be used as the deionizer for the determination of lithium content in the oil field water. Flame atomic absorption spectrometry was applied to the determination of micro amount of lithium in the oil field water of certain area. In order to determine which method is more appropriate for the determination of lithium content in the oil field water, standard curve method and standard addition method were compared. The effects of dilution, coexistent ions, and deionizers on the determination were studied. For the determination of lithium content in the same diluted oil field water samples, there exist obvious differences between the results obtained from standard addition method and standard curve method. Standard addition method gives results with a larger error, whereas standard curve method gives more accurate results. It is difficult to eliminate the interferences when the standard addition method is used. The standard curve method is found to be more suitable for the determination of micro amount of lithium in the oil field water for its accuracy, simplicity, and feasibility. When the standard curve method is used, both the determined lithium concentration and the recovery change with the dilution extent of the oil field water. In order to get an accurate result, the oil field water sample should be diluted to 1/200 or less. In this case, the recovery by standard addition method ranges from 94.3% to 96.9%. When sodium phosphate or sodium chloride is used as the deionizer, the recovery by standard addition method ranges from 94.6% to 98.6%, or from 94.2% to 96.3%. In the determination of lithium content in oil field water, there are larger experimental errors without the addition of any deionizer. When the concentration of coexistent ions is within an allowed range, the addition of sodium phosphate as a deionizer can eliminate the interferences of the coexistent ions with the determination of the lithium content. If sodium chloride is used as a deionizer, a more accurate result can be obtained when the sodium content in the samples is near the sodium content in the standard solutions. In general, tinder suitable experimental conditions, sodium chloride can be used as the deionizer for the determination of lithium content in the oil field water.
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://ir.isl.ac.cn/handle/363002/2125
专题青海盐湖研究所知识仓储
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Yang Hong-jun,Ye Xiu-shen,Li Bing,et al. Determination of Lithium in the Oil Field Water by Flame AtomicAbsorption Spectrometry[J]. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS,2009,29(1):263-267.
APA Yang Hong-jun,Ye Xiu-shen,Li Bing,Wu Zhi-jian,&Li Wu.(2009).Determination of Lithium in the Oil Field Water by Flame AtomicAbsorption Spectrometry.SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS,29(1),263-267.
MLA Yang Hong-jun,et al."Determination of Lithium in the Oil Field Water by Flame AtomicAbsorption Spectrometry".SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS 29.1(2009):263-267.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Yang Hong-jun]的文章
[Ye Xiu-shen]的文章
[Li Bing]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Yang Hong-jun]的文章
[Ye Xiu-shen]的文章
[Li Bing]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Yang Hong-jun]的文章
[Ye Xiu-shen]的文章
[Li Bing]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。